Maywood Signals That It Will Green-light New Housing Development

Friday, September 8, 2017 || By Michael Romain || @maywoodnews || UPDATED: 9/8/17

During a Sept. 5 regular meeting, the Maywood Board of Trustees gave the village’s attorney and staff the go-ahead to put together a redevelopment agreement that would dictate the construction of a 68-unit, 5-story apartment building on the site of a vacant lot at 800-820 S. 5th Ave. in Maywood, which is currently owned by the village.

The nonprofit Interfaith Housing Development Corporation is developing the building, which will target tenants who make no more than 60 percent of the area median income. All of those tenants, Interfaith officials have said, are required to have some kind of income.

Interfaith officials added that they’ll try looking for a grocer to fill the first-floor commercial space in the proposed building, although they explained that they can’t guarantee that they’ll land a grocer as a commercial tenant.

Immediately before the Sept. 5 meeting, a TIF hearing was held, which is a requirement because the property Interfaith is seeking to buy sits in the village’s Madison St. TIF district and was purchased with TIF funds.

Officials with both the village and Interfaith explained that the nonprofit will nonetheless pay property taxes and will not seek any TIF funding.

As he has in the past, Perry Vietti, Interfaith’s president, stressed that the proposed development, despite its classification as affordable housing, is not “public housing.” Most low-income housing in the U.S. is now typically financed through low-income housing tax credits, Vietti said.

Interfaith had tried developing in Maywood in 2012, but was turned away after many residents rallied against the proposal. Vietti has stated recently that much of the dialogue about the proposal five years ago was driven by misconceptions and confusion about what Interfaith was trying to do.

Back then, Vietti explained, many people thought that Interfaith was trying to build the equivalent of a public housing project in Maywood; this wasn’t the case, he said.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Maywood Police Chief Valdimir Talley crystallized why most residents voiced their disapproval in 2012 and why some still have those same concerns today.

“People have a problem with the word ‘affordability,'” Talley said, before expressing his support of the proposal. He said that the Interfaith development will “add value to the village.”

Vietti said that Interfaith will work with residents, village staff and village officials “to make sure that what we build is what you want. We don’t want to just ram something down somebody’s throats.”

Maywood Trustee Isiah Brandon said that he was “truly excited about the development” and that welcoming Interfaith would help improve the common perception about the village that many people in the business development community have about Maywood.

“[There’s this tone] about Maywood that we are not serious about development,” he said. “[Accepting Interfaith] sends a message that Maywood is serious about economic development.”

Angela Smith, Maywood’s business development coordinator, also expressed her support for the development.

“Community development sees this as an opportunity to have a continuum of Maywoodians staying in the our community,” she said, adding that the building will be only one of three in the village with an elevator for elderly residents who may not be able to navigate stairs.

Smith said that the development could attract young, working people with aspirations to rent within the village and elderly people who may want to move out of homes that they can no longer maintain. She argued that attracting people to the village’s downtown area — which is along Fifth Ave., between Lake St. and Quincy St. — could be a catalyst to more business locating in the area.

David Myers, the Maywood’s assistant village manager, said that a citizen’s working group will be formed throughout the development process so that residents can give their input as Interfaith works toward completing the building.

Addressing some residents’ concerns, Smith said that, although Interfaith officials met with the Maywood Housing Authority, Interfaith will likely not receive direct vouchers from MHA.

Vietti said that Interfaith wasn’t interested in seeking housing vouchers from MHA; rather, the meeting was designed to give MHA a heads-up about the proposed development.

Smith said that the Interfaith development could generate upwards of $124,000 in property tax revenue a year. Vietti said that the development would cost about $20 million.

The village board directed staff and the village’s contracted attorney to work with Interfaith on drafting a redevelopment agreement that the board would approve at a later date. They’ll also work to close the purchase of the village-owned property, which according to recent documents, was appraised at $200,000.

Village attorney Michael Jurusik said that, once the property is sold, the revenue from the sale will go back into the Madison St. TIF fund. Jurusik said that if the board “gets to the point of approving a draft redevelopment agreement,” it is “actually approving this development.”

Jurusik said that the village would be approving a redevelopment agreement that calls for an exact build-out, which means that Interfaith would be obligated to construct the building based on the specifications — including the design, building materials, etc. — laid out in the agreement.

Jurusik added that the village will not turn over the property until Interfaith has secured financing, completed building plans, applied for a building permit and are ready to build.

Vietti said that he was confident that Interfaith would secure financing, adding that, in the best case scenario, construction could start “14 months from now.” VFP

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Maywood Signals That It Will Green-light New Housing Development”

  1. I was at that meeting and I asked the question could income derive from medicaid and section eight voucher and he said yes. So NO they don’t have to have a job. They have to have some kind of income which could be public aid. I also asked how did they think they would secure businesses for the first floor since Madison street already is full of empty store fronts and he provided no answer. So it is sad that this is going through because I live on the 800 block of S. 6th Street and this will impact me as well as the banquet hall where currently they park in that empty field. So where also are they going to park?? Someone said the empty cease fire building? Because they lost that funding. If I had known this was in the works truly would have not bought my home where I did. This does not help the taxpayers of Maywood, just a housing project. Mark my words you will not be happy later on….

    1. JANET: I’m really surprise that the trustees approved this. I am marking your words that the residents of Maywood is going to be happy about this.

    2. This is the question most were afraid to directly ask during the first presentation. This is not what we were led to believe—it was indicated it would be all people with jobs, although a lot of brows went up when the developer said he estimates only half the occupants may be able to afford cars. I have a bad feeling about this “project” now given what was said above, and if nothing else a 5 story structure where there is nothing else is completely out of place. So many of us worked hard to turn the town around, and its happening, I’m afraid that if somehow this building gets loaded up with people on vouchers it will finish us off. 5 stories is also just too high at this point in our redevelopment. The trustees need to either revisit the scope of this project or citizens need to reject it—again. This should have been a mixed income development, at a minimum, from the outset. A place like Oak Park with a diverse business and income base can absorb something like this–dropping it into a blighted area will only make this a housing project. Communities in Chicago and across the country have been soundly rejecting projects like this in their neighborhoods–we should too, especially given the above comments

  2. Reading this article, I think this is a very bad mistake that the trustees of Maywood really did of approving this new housing development that will be build on 5th Ave. This is going to hurt the residents of Maywood, especially senior citizens who pay taxes and worked very hard with their tax payer dollars. I am just at a loss of words that the village of Maywood is not making no progress in moving forward. I am officially done!

  3. So, since 2102, the first time this project was proposed (and rejected) by the citizens is this the only major development we have managed to bring forth??
    I think its time for some fresh ideas for serious economic development. This is looking like it might turn into a housing project, especially if accepting section 8 and public assistance

  4. This is a terrible idea. Mayor Daily tore down the projects in Chicago to relocate the impoverished residents so that the white folks can move back to the inner city. This is the last thing we need in Maywood. Fix Washington Blvd. pave our allies. Take care of the current residents would be a major step to beautify our village..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s